Transition Planning Toolkit: Governance Compass

Updated: May 2024

Use the ‘Governance Compass’ tool in your board committee meetings to ensure that your committee’s work considers, aligns with and supports the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan.

The role of a NED in transition planning within board committees

Transition planning falls within the remit of the board. While boards cannot delegate responsibility for transition planning to any sub-committee, they often delegate specific tasks to sub-committees.

Beyond the board sub-committees identified under the UK Corporate Governance code: the nomination committee, the audit and the remuneration committee, boards may establish non-mandatory committees, such as a climate committee or sustainability committee.

Jump to each committee section using the 'In this article we cover' links on the right of the page.

The role of the Nomination Committee

The nomination committee plays an important role in ensuring senior management have the right competencies, knowledge and expertise to effectively design, develop and deliver the transition plan, and that the board is equipped to challenge whether the plan prepared by executives is robust and credible.

The nomination committee does this through leading the process of appointments, ensuring plans are in place for orderly succession to both the board and senior management positions, and overseeing the development of a diverse pipeline for succession.

Boards hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring the long-term success of the company through strategic planning. Thus, they must anticipate future changes and challenges and take early action to ensure they have the necessary resources to address them – including the expertise and capabilities within the boardroom.

It is important to ensure that your board and senior management with responsibility for the transition plan have, or have access to, the skills, competencies and knowledge required to provide effective oversight of the transition plan.

The nomination committee plays a key role in taking a proactive stance on appointments. By thinking further ahead than the immediate replacement of retiring board members, the nomination committee can more effectively align succession plans and appointments with the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan.

Six questions for the nomination committee

Built upon the board’s prior work integrating the transition plan with the company’s overall strategy, these questions act as a framework for structuring nomination committee meeting agendas, and for reporting back to your fellow board members at board meetings.

• Have we assessed what skillset is required for the board and its committees to challenge whether the Strategic Ambition and the transition plan prepared by executives is robust and credible?
• Do we reassess the make-up of the board as a result of the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan?
• How often is a skills audit undertaken and are we keeping up with the pace of change?
• Has the skills audit identified gaps in skills, knowledge or experience?
• Does the nomination committee have recommendations regarding any changes to the composition of the board?
• Do we take account of the technical skills and knowledge required by the board and committees in the context of transition planning and the evolving climate-related reporting landscape when developing succession plans and recruiting members?

Notes on disclosure

• The FCA has encouraged listed companies to supplement existing reporting with reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and the TPT Disclosure Framework.
• Reporting aligned with the TPT Disclosure Framework should include how the body(s) or individual(s) determines whether appropriate skills and competencies are available or will be developed to oversee the transition plan. (TPT sub-element 5.1 – Board oversight and reporting)

References and resources:

• The UK Corporate Governance Code, July 2018
• Guidance on Board Effectiveness, July 2018
• TPT Disclosure Framework, Nov 2023

The role of the Audit and Risk Committee

The audit committee has historically dealt with tasks related to financial reporting, internal controls, risk management, compliance and audit. In the context of an evolving sustainability reporting landscape, the role of the audit and risk committee becomes ever more prominent.

How can the audit and risk committee support transition planning?

The audit and risk committee can play a key role in overseeing internal controls over sustainability-related risks and opportunities. The committee may also assist the board in carrying out its responsibilities in relation to sustainability-related disclosures.

The committee may oversee the processes and controls in place to ensure the accuracy and robustness of sustainability-related data. This helps to prepare the company to meet disclosure requirements and supports the development of a high-quality transition plan.

The board and committee should be clear on internal roles and responsibilities in connection to these required disclosures.

The approach taken for assurance may reflect the outcome of a dialogue between investors and the board such that the needs of stakeholders are understood and met.

FRC revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code

Key considerations:

In 2023, the FRC proposed several changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code), including new provisions related to audit, risk and internal control. Although these changes will not now be made, the audit and risk committee nevertheless has responsibility for overseeing the integrity of narrative reporting, including on sustainability matters, and reviewing any significant reporting judgements.

Where a company commissions assurance or verification of ESG metrics and other sustainability-related disclosures, this should be reported on in the annual report. The TPT Disclosure Framework recommends that the company make certain disclosures about any assurance or verification engagement that it has sought, such as the nature of the engagement and which aspects of the transition plan have been assured or verified.

Ten questions for the audit and risk committee

These questions act as prompts for the audit and risk committee to consider in meeting agendas, and for reporting back to your fellow board members at board meetings.

The committee may consider prompts on non-financial reporting to reference TCFD-aligned reporting along with any supplementary reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and/or the TPT Disclosure Framework. The UK has confirmed its commitment to implement the ISSB standards. The output of the TPT has been designed to lock into future ISSB reporting and applies ISSB corporate reporting norms.

• Are you satisfied that the company has adequate internal controls over risk, including climate-related risk?
• Are climate-related risks understood within the broader question of what they mean for the business, how they shape the company strategy?
• Are there clear procedures and triggers in place to elevate climate-related risks to the board quickly?
• Has management undertaken a gap analysis of current TCFD-aligned disclosures and supplementary reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and the TPT Disclosure Framework and is there a plan in place to remediate any gaps?
• Is the non-financial information used in the disclosures reliable and fit for purpose?
• What assurance do we require to support the disclosures?
• How has the board assessed whether the audit and risk committee has a balance of skills and competencies necessary to fulfil its expanding remit?
• What are the trends in climate-related reporting and regulation that we need to be aware of and for which we need to prepare? Are we doing enough now to prepare for future mandatory disclosure of transition plans, and mandatory assurance?
• Are the measures to be used in performance-related remuneration science-based and independently verified, particularly in relation to the Strategic Ambition of the transition plan? (This may involve working with the remuneration committee)
• What steps have we taken to ensure that we possess the necessary skills and expertise to effectively fulfil our evolving responsibilities related to the transition plan and sustainability reporting? (This may involve working with the nomination committee.)

Notes on disclosure

The FCA has encouraged listed companies to supplement existing reporting with reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and the TPT Disclosure Framework.

Reporting aligned with the TPT Disclosure Framework should include:

• how the body(s) or individual(s) takes into account the transition plan when overseeing the entity’s strategy, its decisions on major transactions and its risk management processes and related policies, including whether the body(s) or individual(s) has considered trade-offs associated with the transition plan.
• how the body(s) or individual(s) oversees the setting of targets in the transition plan, and monitors progress towards these targets and the wider strategic ambition of the transition plan.

(TPT sub-element 5.1 – Board oversight and reporting)

Notes on external assurance

The TPT provide notes on external assurance in its online implementation guidance. Key takeaways include:

• The TPT recommendations to include material information related to the transition plan in your general purpose financial report does not change the scope of the statutory audit.
• While external assurance for climate related information is an ecosystem that is still very nascent, some entities are choosing to obtain external assurance on sustainability- related information, including GHG emissions. The most widely used assurance standards for these engagements include ISAE 3000 (Revised), ISAE 3410, AA1000 Assurance Standard v3; and ISO 14054-3:2019.
• Dedicated sustainability-related assurance standards and ethics codes are currently under development. The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) concluded its consultation on a Proposed International Standard on Sustainability Assurance (ISSA 5000) in December 2023. The IAASB aims to issue the final Standard before the end of 2024. In January 2024, the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA) launched a consultation on draft International Ethics Standards for Sustainability Assurance (including International Independence Standards) (IESSA) and ethics standards for sustainability reporting.
• Reporting aligned with the TPT disclosure framework should include whether the body(s) or individual(s) responsible for executive oversight and delivery of the transition plan uses controls and procedures to support the oversight of the transition plan and ensure the reliability of information disclosed; if so, an entity shall disclose how these controls and procedures are integrated with other internal functions and information about which aspects of the transition plan are subject to external assurance or verification, including the nature of the assurance or verification. (TPT sub-element 5.2 – Roles, responsibility and accountability).

References and resources:

• The UK Corporate Governance Code, July 2018
• Guidance on Board Effectiveness, July 2018
• TPT Disclosure Framework, Nov 2023
• TPT Build your Transition Plan, Nov 2023

The role of the Remuneration Committee

The remuneration committee plays a pivotal role in aligning remuneration and incentive structures with the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan.

The company’s remuneration program needs to align with the Strategic Ambition of the transition plan to ensure that the interests of executives and other relevant staff are aligned with the successful delivery of the plan.

NEDs on the remuneration committee should ensure that performance metrics are strategically aligned, material to the individual, measurable, clear and transparent. Targets should be appropriately stretching for the relevant individual.

Relevant Guidance: WTW’s Executive Compensation Guidance for the Climate Transition (pp 15-17), and 2023 Addendum (pp 21-22)

Eight questions for remuneration committees

Built upon the board’s prior work integrating the transition plan with the company’s overall strategy, these questions act as framework for structuring remuneration committee meeting agendas, and for reporting back to your fellow board members at board meetings.

• How are we updating and aligning our executive remuneration policy to strengthen the incentives for the transition plan?
• How does executive remuneration link to our transition plan and KPIs (metrics and targets)?
• Do we need to interact with any other parts of the governance structure in respect of risks arising from remuneration?
• How will any financial and non-financial performance measures support long-term thinking and delivery against the transition plan?
• Have we considered how the choice of any particular measure may encourage negative behaviour and what steps have we taken to manage such risks?
• Have we consulted the audit and risk committee on performance measures?
• What steps have we taken to make sure that any performance measures are stretching and aligned with the ambition of the transition plan?
• Are the performance measures independently verified, science-based, relevant/within remit?

Notes on disclosure

The FCA has encouraged listed companies to supplement existing reporting with reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and the TPT Disclosure Framework.

Reporting aligned with the TPT Disclosure Framework should describe:

• how the entity aligns or plans to align its incentive and remuneration structures with the Strategic Ambition of its transition plan, and may include information about: the metric(s) used, whether the metric(s) is within the short-term and/or long-term incentive plan(s), the typical percentage weighting of the transition plan-related metric(s) within the incentive plan for the executive population and the percentage of total executive remuneration that is linked to transition plan-related metric(s).
• whether and how incentive and remuneration structures for employees across the organisation are aligned with the Strategic Ambition of its transition plan, including whether it has applied a consistent approach with that for executives or whether it has taken a differentiated approach for specific teams or roles.
  (TPT sub-element 5.4 – Incentives and remuneration)

The TPT provides an example of how a construction materials company discloses information relevant to governance processes including on remuneration in Explore the Disclosure Recommendations.

References and resources:

• The UK Corporate Governance Code, July 2018
• Guidance on Board Effectiveness, July 2018
• IOD Centre for Corporate Governance - A comprehensive review of climate-focused executive remuneration
• DP 23: Finance for Positive Sustainable Change, February 2023

The role of the Sustainability Committee

Often delegated tasks relating to achieving the company’s climate ambition and targets, the sustainability committee can play a pivotal role in crafting the company’s Strategic Ambition and a credible transition plan, and oversight on the delivery of the plan.

Boards hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring the long- term success of the company through strategic planning. In some organisations there is no longer a requirement for a sustainability committee, however, in many organisations this committee still plays an important role. Chapter Zero has found that the chair of the sustainability committee often plays a crucial role in the development of a credible transition plan for the company.

The sustainability committee can support the board in taking a strategic approach to the initiation or continued development of the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan such that it is integrated with the company’s strategy. Bringing recommendations to the board based on well-grounded committee research and insights can support this.

Five questions for the sustainability committee

These questions act as prompts to consider in sustainability committee meetings.

• Is the role of the committee in relation to the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan clearly defined in the Terms of Reference?
• Do we have the skills and knowledge to fulfil the role of the committee in relation to the Strategic Ambition and transition plan?
• Is the board connected with the work of the committee on the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition planning?
• How are we engaging stakeholders including employees and investors among others in the development of the Strategic Ambition and transition plan?
• How is the committee supporting the board in oversight activities which have not been delegated to the committee? E.g., providing useful information for strategic decision-making related to the company’s Strategic Ambition and transition plan.

Notes on disclosure

The FCA has encouraged listed companies to supplement existing reporting with reporting aligned with the ISSB standards and the TPT disclosure framework.

Reporting aligned with the TPT disclosure framework should include information about:

• the governance body(s) (which can include a board, committee, or equivalent body charged with governance) or individual(s) responsible for oversight of the transition plan.
• management’s role in the governance processes, controls, and procedures used to monitor, manage, and oversee the transition plan, as well as how it is embedded within the entity’s wider control, review, and accountability mechanisms.

(TPT sub-element 5.1 Board oversight and reporting, 5.2 Roles, responsibility and accountability)

References and resources:

• TPT Disclosure Framework, Nov 2023
• Chapter Zero - What we’ve learned from Sustainability Committee Chairs