Scope emissions explained
What emissions are my company responsible for?
The far-reaching impacts of corporate activity mean that companies influence a wide range of greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting activities across their value chain, many of which are not obviously related to a company’s primary business.
To help companies define the boundaries of the greenhouse gas emissions they are responsible for, the World Resources Institute Greenhouse Gas Protocol has defined three categories: Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3. The GHG Protocol categorises emissions based on how directly they relate to a company’s activities. The Scopes also reflect how much control a company has over certain types of emissions.
Scope 1 covers direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the company. This includes emissions from company-owned or operated facilities and vehicles.
Scope 2 covers emissions from the generation of electricity purchased by the company.
Scope 3 refers to all other indirect emissions within a company’s value chain. Despite being less directly related to a company’s main activity, these emissions can make up a significant portion of a company’s impact on the climate. Scope 3 can be broadly grouped into two categories:
Upstream emissions from activities involved in the creation of a company’s services or goods. This includes emissions from employee travel and commuting to work, and emissions in the supply chain from the production of purchased goods and services the company uses or sells.
Downstream emissions occur from the distribution or use of a company’s goods including the disposal of products. If a product indirectly consumes energy during use, for example because it needs to be heated by another appliance, including these emissions in Scope 3 is optional.
To illustrate these different Scopes, here is an example for a fictional coffee manufacturer:
Understanding and tracking Scope emissions
The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD): a briefing to address nature in the boardroom
In September 2023, the TNFD published its final Recommendations for businesses and financial institutions to disclose material interactions with nature. These aim to inform better decision-making by companies and capital providers, and contribute to a shift in global financial flows toward nature-positive outcomes and the goals of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. This briefing, produced by the Climate Governance Initiative, explains what the latest TNFD recommendations mean for you as a board director and key questions to ask in the boardroom to ensure your organisations can benefit from the opportunity to make impactful changes for business and nature.
Analysis of 2022 UK Company Annual Reports
A UKEB analysis of 2022 UK Company Annual Reports: A Study in Connectivity.
Five tips for your annual reports
With extensive expertise chairing multiple FTSE350 boards, as an investor and pension fund trustee, Chapter Zero Supporting Chair Sarah Bates shares her top five tips for this annual reporting season.